Jeevanvidya Discussion Forums
May 22, 2012, 12:29:39 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Note: New user registration is Enable till 15 Aug 2011
 
  Back to Website   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: what is the answer.............?  (Read 1785 times)
omkar
Junior Contributor
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 86


Read "Many Lifes Many Master" Brian L. Weiss


« on: February 14, 2009, 06:57:47 AM »

Hello all
This is question is of a beautiful story
Can we discuss this on JV forum

I have a question. It can be said that a man who is good, virtuous, a believer in God, goes
to heaven. And a man who is not good, not virtuous, does not believe in God, goes into hell, into
eternal fire. My question is,? he said, ?that you have simplified things too much. I want to know:

if a man is good and virtuous and does not believe in God, where does he go? A man who is bad, who
is not virtuous but is a believer in God ? where does he go??

Thanks JV Thanks all members Thank you
Omkar
may god bless all with "akhand sadgurukrupa & effortless namsmaran"
Report to moderator   Logged

I am vary Happy & in deepest ( bottom hearth) Gratitude to god for blessing "every body be with akhand sadgurukrupa & effortless namsmaran"
mk
Guest Members
Ultimate Contributor
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 545


साधनेने प्राप्त सिद्धी ही साध्य नाही साधन 


« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2009, 08:02:51 AM »

Namonamah,
Omkarjee Namaste.

If your question is with respect to GOD as defined by JV, please check if the question remains meaningful under that definition. Paricularly, by God, do you mean Dev, Eashwar, or Parameshwar?

If not, the question should be put to those who say this, or at least to those who believe in that ideology.

I agree with you though that the description is too simplistic.

As someone who does not believe in what you have written (and also does not accept the JV definition(s) of GOD), I can just say that if one does what one believes in, he/she is in heaven; otherwise, he/she is in hell.

If you convince yourself that robbery is good, you will be in heaven. If you do good to others without wanting to do so, you will be in hell.

But of course, that is not JV!

Best wishes
Milind Khadilkar
Report to moderator   Logged

या लिखांणात व्यक्त झालेल्या मतांशी लेखक सहमत असेलच असे नाही.

This content does not necessarily represent the views of the author.
dr.nutanpol
Senior Namdharaks
Ultimate Contributor
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 429



« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2009, 01:07:47 AM »

Namaskar to Omkar and all,

Jeevanvidya does not believe in the ideology of hell and heaven. JV says that the person receives the reaction of his action as per the law of nature when the suitable time to receive the reaction comes and  also when suitable circumstances develop  to receive the reaction.
It is not necessary that reaction will be experienced immediately. It may take several years for it. The reaction is received when favorable circumstances are developed and after particular time as per the type of action.

Ex. Sprouts of beans may arise next day while it may take 150-200 years in case of walnut tree to get the offshoot from its seed.   
The life is continuous so if we do not experience the reaction in this birth due to some reason then we may experience it in our next birth.

For example if daughter-in-law gives ill treatment to her mother-in-law then she may face the same ill treatment from her daughter-in-law in future. But if her life is short then she may experience the reaction in next birth.   

According to JV philosophy, God believer does not get any concession from facing the unwanted reaction if his behavior is not in harmony with the nature.

मेल्यानंतर आपल्या कर्मांनुसार स्वर्ग/ नरक अनुभवयाला मिळतो. जीवनविद्येला ही संकल्पना मान्य नाही. प्रत्येक व्यक्तीला आपल्या कर्माची प्रतिक्रिया निसर्ग नियमानुसार अनुभवयाला मिळते. ही प्रतिक्रिया ताबडतोब मिळते असे नाही. ज्या प्रकारचे कर्म असेल त्यानुसार प्रतिक्रिया प्रकट होण्यासाठी अनुकुल काळ आणि अनुकुल परिस्थितीची आवश्यकता असते.

काही बीजांपासून अंकुर लवकर उगवतो. तर काही बीजे उदा. अक्रोडाचे झाड येण्यासाठी १५०-ते २०० वर्षे लागतात.

 त्यामुळे कर्माच्या प्रकारावर अवलंबून आहे की, प्रतिक्रिया कोणत्या प्रकारची असू शकेल व ती केंव्हा अनुभवायला मिळेल.
एखादी व्यक्ती कर्म कोणत्या प्रकारचे करते यावर तिला मिळणारी प्रतिक्रिया अवलंबून आहे. ती व्यक्ती देवावर विश्वास ठेवते की नाही यांवर अवलंबून नाही. देवावर विश्वास ठेवणाऱ्या व्यक्तीला निसर्गनियमांविरूध्द वर्तन केल्यास सुट मिळत नाही.

May God bless all!

Report to moderator   Logged

Sarve Sukhinha santu! Sarve bhadrani pashyantu!
May Divinity Within All get bloomed!
May God Bless all!
omkar
Junior Contributor
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 86


Read "Many Lifes Many Master" Brian L. Weiss


« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2009, 08:30:37 AM »

I am reminded of a beautiful incident. It happened that Edmund Burke, one of the great historians
of England, had a friend who was as famous as Edmund Burke, but as a theologian. Even the king
and queen used to come to listen to his sermons on Sunday, but Edmund Burke never went.
One day the friend asked him, ?This is a little hard on me. I have been expecting that one day you
would come. Even the king, the queen, the whole royal family comes. All the great scholars of the
university come. You, who are my only friend, are the only person... just for courtesy?s sake, you
should come at least once.?
He said, ?It is because of that, that I have not come. But you are insisting. This Sunday I am coming
? be ready.?
He said, ?What do you mean by ?be ready???
He said, ?Everything will be clear when I come into the church.?
The friend prepared a really beautiful sermon. All Christian priests prepare their sermons. This is
something unknown to the mystics ? preparing a sermon. Are you a teacher in a school, a professor
in a college? Don?t you have anything spontaneous to say? At least those who have experienced
should have each moment a spontaneous flow of fresh water, fresh energy. A prepared speech,
however articulate, is basically false because it is not of the heart.
Edmund Burke came. The friend had prepared his best sermon; he wanted to impress Edmund
Burke. He continually watched the face of Edmund Burke ? but no emotions, no feelings, no impact
of what he was saying. He started stuttering, he became nervous: that man was sitting in the front
row like a stone statue.
And then there was the question hour, and the first to stand up was Edmund Burke. He said, ?I
have a question. You said in your speech that a man who is good, virtuous, a believer in God, goes
to heaven. And a man who is not good, not virtuous, does not believe in God, goes into hell, into
eternal fire. My question is,? he said, ?that you have simplified things too much. I want to know: if a
man is good and virtuous and does not believe in God, where does he go? A man who is bad, who
is not virtuous but is a believer in God ? where does he go??
The theologian was at a loss, because any answer would be troublesome. He said, ?Forgive me, I
cannot answer it spontaneously.?
Edmund Burke said, ?I knew it, because the whole speech was not spontaneous at all. You are a
parrot. How much time do you need to look into scriptures and libraries and find out the answer?
You don?t have the answer, and you have the nerve to say so emphatically who goes to hell and who
goes to heaven. And I have asked a simple question... ?
The theologian said, ?I want seven days. Next Sunday I will answer.?
Those seven days were really hellfire. He tried hard, this way and that way, ?But whatever you say
seems to be wrong. A man who does not believe in God but is good, is virtuous ? you cannot send
him to hell. Then what is the need of being good and virtuous? A man who believes in God but is
not good, is not virtuous ? you cannot send him to heaven, because if you send him to heaven then
what is wrong in being a sinner, being bad, not being virtuous? Just believe in God... Then drop all
this nonsense, make it simple: those who believe in God go to heaven and those who don?t believe
in God go to hell. Then why unnecessarily bring these qualities of goodness and virtue??
He was going crazy. He could not sleep and Sunday came ? and it came fast. Time is very nasty.
When you want it to go slowly it goes fast, and when you want it to go fast, it goes very slowly. It
always goes against your wishes.
He went to the church one hour before he had to give the sermon. Still, he had no answer. He
thought he should pray to Jesus Christ: ?Help me. Scriptures are of no help. Libraries... for seven
days I have worked hard, but no answer. In fact, Edmund Burke was right; it was out of courtesy
that he was not coming. I unnecessarily dragged him in and now he has created trouble not only for
me, but for my whole congregation. Now it is up to you to help me.?
So bowing down before the statue of Jesus Christ, putting his head at his feet, he said, ?Help
me because it is not a question of my prestige; your whole religion is at stake. I am simply a
representative.?
He had not slept for seven days, so he fell asleep just at the feet of Jesus Christ. He had a dream,
a dream in which he saw that he was sitting in a train, a very fast train, and he inquired, ?Where is
this train going and where am I going??
They said, ?This train is going to heaven.?
He said, ?This is good. It is better that I should see with my own eyes what kind of people are
there.? So he figured it out: if he can find Socrates there, that means that just goodness, innocence,
sincerity is enough; there is no need for belief in God. ?If Socrates is there, Gautam Buddha is there,
Mahavira is there... but if I don?t find these people there, then I can see what kind of people are
there ? because Adolf Hitler believes in God, Napoleon Bonaparte believes in God, Alexander the
Great believes in God and goes on killing people. Nadirshah believes in God, and his only joy is
to burn people alive. If I find these people there then I am finished; I have to say the truth to the
congregation.?
He reached heaven. He could not believe his eyes. He cleaned his glasses, looked again. The
station was looking just like a wreck, a ruin. There was written ?Paradise? but the word had faded; it
was perhaps millions of years before that somebody had written it. And all over, it was dirty.
Perhaps he thought... has he come to India or what? This is not paradise, maybe Vileparle. What
kind of paradise is this?
But he got down from the train, went to the inquiry office ? there was nobody. He tried to find out.... ?I
want to inquire about a few people, whether they are here ? Gautam Buddha, Socrates, Pythagoras,
Heraclitus, Epicurus, Mahavira, Lao Tzu.?
People said, ?Never heard of them.?
And he saw people... just dry bones, as if all juice had been taken out of them, skeletons. He
inquired, ?Who are these people? And somebody was a great saint ? he had heard the name.
Somebody was Saint Francis, somebody was Ekhart...
He said, ?My God!? And dust, layers of dust on all these people ? and the whole place looked as if
the rains had not come for centuries. Everything was dry, nothing was green ? no flowers, no foliage.
He had never seen such a place. He said, ?My God, if this is paradise, God save the queen! This is
a dangerous place.?
And the saints were there, sitting under trees which were naked, without any leaves. He asked
whether spring comes here or not ? they said, ?Never heard of it before. What do you mean by
spring?? No dance, no song, no joy...
He rushed back to the railway station and inquired whether there was any train going to hell. They
said, ?Just now it is standing on the platform.? He went on the train to see hell, what the situation was
? because if this is the situation in heaven... you cannot conceive what the situation will be in hell!
But as he went closer, the breeze was becoming cooler, fragrant. And when he reached the station
he saw beautiful people ? men, women, children. He said, ?My God, there seems to be something
wrong. This place should be paradise, everybody looks so happy.?
He got down and he asked somebody, ?Have you heard about Socrates, Gautam Buddha,
Bodhidharma, Basho??
They said, ?Those are the people who have changed the place. This place used to be so rotten, but
since those fellows came here, they have changed the whole place. Now everything is green, an
oasis. There is love, there is song, there is music. Wait for the night, when everybody dances, sings;
right now everybody is working in the fields. Look at that man ? he?s Socrates working in the field.?
It was such a shock. He woke up, and it was time for the congregation to arrive. People had started
coming and they were standing around him and watching him: ?What is the matter? Has he fallen
asleep, is he unconscious or what??
Edmund Burke had come to listen to the answer.
The theologian said, ?I tried my hardest but could not find the answer. Just now I have had a dream
? I will relate the dream to you and you can draw your own conclusions. My conclusions are this:
I?m sorry, but what I have been telling you was not right. It is not the question that the good people
or the virtuous people go to heaven; on the contrary, it is just that wherever the virtuous people and
the good people go, they create heaven. And belief in God is irrelevant. It is your individual whim ?
you can believe, you can not believe. It does not matter in the ultimate conclusions of life.
Report to moderator   Logged

I am vary Happy & in deepest ( bottom hearth) Gratitude to god for blessing "every body be with akhand sadgurukrupa & effortless namsmaran"
mk
Guest Members
Ultimate Contributor
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 545


साधनेने प्राप्त सिद्धी ही साध्य नाही साधन 


« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2009, 09:19:40 AM »

Namonamah,
Omkarjee Namaste.

1. What is the beauty about the incident?
2. What is the source of this story? Who was the thiologian concerned? In another version of the story the dream sequence (Aahaa!! Aawaaraa!!) does not appear.
3. What is the moral of the story? Is it that dreams are better than scriptures?
4. Edmund Burke was known to be the foremost rationalist of his times. His friend must be certainly aware of it. Being friends, they must have discussed theology and this important question from theology must have been discussed between them.
5. Is your dumb (not counting his eloquence) theologian the representative of all theologians? At least of all Christian theologians? Are you aware whether Christian thought has any answer to the question? I feel Christian theology would not be so shallow.... not that I know it.
6. If a man is good and virtuous but not a JV follower and who does not chant VP, does JV say that he will not achieve sukh, shaanti, aishwarya etc.?

Best wishes
Milind Khadilkar
Report to moderator   Logged

या लिखांणात व्यक्त झालेल्या मतांशी लेखक सहमत असेलच असे नाही.

This content does not necessarily represent the views of the author.
omkar
Junior Contributor
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 86


Read "Many Lifes Many Master" Brian L. Weiss


« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2009, 01:44:04 PM »

Hello Milind How are u?
Thanks for your reply
1] The answer given by theologian is the essence of story
2] Not only christian but all the religion generally tend to think that way
3] I just wish I was a member/follower of JV to answer your 6th question Wink
4 ] I dint know the real source of the story

Thanks JV Thanks all members Thank you
Omkar
may god bless all with "akhand sadgurukrupa & effortless namsmaran"
Report to moderator   Logged

I am vary Happy & in deepest ( bottom hearth) Gratitude to god for blessing "every body be with akhand sadgurukrupa & effortless namsmaran"
kanchan
Junior Contributor
**
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 29



« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2009, 02:49:51 PM »

Dear Dr.Nutantai
 
Namaskar!!!

From You this Qute,I need some explanation for my querry:
मेल्यानंतर आपल्या कर्मांनुसार स्वर्ग/ नरक अनुभवयाला मिळतो. जीवनविद्येला ही संकल्पना मान्य नाही. प्रत्येक व्यक्तीला आपल्या कर्माची प्रतिक्रिया निसर्ग नियमानुसार अनुभवयाला मिळते. ही प्रतिक्रिया ताबडतोब मिळते असे नाही. ज्या प्रकारचे कर्म असेल त्यानुसार प्रतिक्रिया प्रकट होण्यासाठी अनुकुल काळ आणि अनुकुल परिस्थितीची आवश्यकता असते.

काही बीजांपासून अंकुर लवकर उगवतो. तर काही बीजे उदा. अक्रोडाचे झाड येण्यासाठी १५०-ते २०० वर्षे लागतात.

 त्यामुळे कर्माच्या प्रकारावर अवलंबून आहे की, प्रतिक्रिया कोणत्या प्रकारची असू शकेल व ती केंव्हा अनुभवायला मिळेल.


My Querry is:

If person is doing good deeds (satkarma) in this birth but due to his bad deeds(dushkarma) he is not getting good fruits.(Acc to your quote).
 then...doesn't person will get disturbed thinking why he is getting bad fruits for satkarmas that he is doing in this birth.ofcourse he cant remember his deeds in last birth?
Report to moderator   Logged

All Best Wishes,

Thanks And Regards

Kanchan Kshirsagar
omkar
Junior Contributor
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 86


Read "Many Lifes Many Master" Brian L. Weiss


« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2009, 05:09:23 PM »

Thanks Kanchan & all

I am also waiting for  answer of the same question

Omkar

Thanks JV Thanks all members Thank you
Omkar
may god bless all with "akhand sadgurukrupa & effortless namsmaran"
« Last Edit: February 16, 2009, 05:17:53 PM by omkar » Report to moderator   Logged

I am vary Happy & in deepest ( bottom hearth) Gratitude to god for blessing "every body be with akhand sadgurukrupa & effortless namsmaran"
dr.nutanpol
Senior Namdharaks
Ultimate Contributor
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 429



« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2009, 08:21:56 PM »


Namaskar to Kanchan, Omkar and all,

According to the laws of nature, happiness and pain, agony we receive in our life are due to our own actions at the level of body and mind. Because it is law of nature that there is relationship between cause and effect. For every effect there is cause and vice versa.

It may happen that though you are doing good actions you may experience troublesome conditions in your life due to your past bad actions.

In such conditions, one has to have patience and face the situation with courage and humility and also try to attain more amount of punya by doing all positive activities like thinking and wishing good about others, helping others, doing Shri Satguru kary and engage mind in relentless VP and naam-smaran.  We should remain in satsang as much as possible because when mind is disturbed due to adverse conditions it is difficult to concentrate on naam-jap or VP. In such conditions, if we do naam sankirtan and VP with others it is easier.

If we surrender ourselves to Satguru, try to do sadhana given by him and remain in satsang and then pray for courage and patience; it really helps. This is the experience of many naamdharaks.

Report to moderator   Logged

Sarve Sukhinha santu! Sarve bhadrani pashyantu!
May Divinity Within All get bloomed!
May God Bless all!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.14 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!